# Arrays proposal: New minimal implementation

**URL:** https://racket.discourse.group/t/arrays-proposal-new-minimal-implementation/3965
**Category:** General
**Tags:** arrays-proposal
**Created:** [October 7, 2025, 2:19am UTC](https://racket.discourse.group/t/arrays-proposal-new-minimal-implementation/3965 "2025-10-07T02:19:57Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Gambiteer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/779978/32.png) [@Gambiteer](https://racket.discourse.group/u/Gambiteer)
#### Post date: [October 7, 2025, 2:19am UTC](https://racket.discourse.group/t/arrays-proposal-new-minimal-implementation/3965/1 "2025-10-07T02:19:57Z")

</div>

At this branch:

> **[GitHub - gambiteer/srfi-231 at 231-bis](https://github.com/gambiteer/srfi-231/tree/231-bis?tab=readme-ov-file)**
>
> 231-bis

I've now committed a "minimal" implementation with no specialized code or error checking, and a test program that can be used to test both the small and regular implementations.

The stripped-down routines in the minimal implementation suggest to me the intrinsic complexity of each routine. `array-reshape`, which did not simplify at all, is the most complex and `array-tile` and `array-block` are of moderate complexity.