# Description of Racket Distribution for download and package repo pages?

**URL:** <https://racket.discourse.group/t/description-of-racket-distribution-for-download-and-package-repo-pages/1608>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [January 2, 2023, 5:44pm UTC](https://racket.discourse.group/t/description-of-racket-distribution-for-download-and-package-repo-pages/1608 "2023-01-02T17:44:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sschwarzer](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/racket.discourse.group/sschwarzer/32/1940_2.png) [@sschwarzer](https://racket.discourse.group/u/sschwarzer)\
**Post date:** [January 2, 2023, 7:09pm UTC](https://racket.discourse.group/t/description-of-racket-distribution-for-download-and-package-repo-pages/1608/2 "2023-01-02T19:09:54Z")

</div>

Not an answer, but related:

> [@What's official racket and what's not?](https://racket.discourse.group/t/whats-official-racket-and-whats-not/1447):
>
> To someone new to Racket - looking at [docs.racket-lang.org](http://docs.racket-lang.org) - this is basically a "soup" of things that seems to be an unordered brain dump of everything Racket related. I may have missed the memo buried on that website (can you blame me?) but if you do not know the history of all these projects (including Racket itself) - what qualifies a project to end up on that site? Are there indicators of how mature a particular project is? For example, is typed racket production quality? What about Rebell…

---

_[View the full topic](https://racket.discourse.group/t/description-of-racket-distribution-for-download-and-package-repo-pages/1608)._