# Having issues with cond

**URL:** <https://racket.discourse.group/t/having-issues-with-cond/765>\
**Category:** Questions & Answers\
**Tags:** question, drracket, creative-racket\
**Created:** [March 4, 2022, 5:28pm UTC](https://racket.discourse.group/t/having-issues-with-cond/765 "2022-03-04T17:28:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![simonls](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/racket.discourse.group/simonls/32/170_2.png) [@simonls](https://racket.discourse.group/u/simonls)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2022, 5:58pm UTC](https://racket.discourse.group/t/having-issues-with-cond/765/3 "2022-03-04T17:58:02Z")

</div>

Just a small note regarding formatting as code, `scheme` was set to be the default and thus can be omitted.

> [@Syntax Highlighting in Discourse?](https://racket.discourse.group/t/syntax-highlighting-in-discourse/240/3):
>
> abcd (define x 19) (define x 19) Ah! Okay. I had set scheme to be the default language highlight... but I had failed to add scheme to the list of legal highlight choices. Seems like there could be a warning about that, sigh... Ah well.

---

_[View the full topic](https://racket.discourse.group/t/having-issues-with-cond/765)._