Hi, i searched a moment before asking in racket mailing list. There is a definition of rec in the official SRFI 31 SRFI 31: A special form `rec' for recursive evaluation that i recopy here: (define-syntax rec (syntax-rules () ((rec (NAME . VARIABLES) .…

[image] damien_mattei: but i do not understand this part: (lambda VARIABLES . BODY) , this seems to not be valid scheme syntax?! There is an implicit requirement that BODY be list-structured for the resulting lambda form to be valid. More specifically, a lambda must have one or more body expr…

Source code of rec from SRFI 31

Questions & Answers

damien_mattei November 6, 2025, 10:22pm 5

thank you for the path because i was lost in the racket github labyrinth here:

Topic		Replies	Views
Return from a lambda Questions & Answers	11	169	October 8, 2025
Is there any equivalent way to emulate symbol-macrolet of ANSI Common Lisp with the Racket's Syntax? Questions & Answers	13	198	June 16, 2024
Illustrate "anonymous recursive functions" à la PowerShell Show & Tell	1	114	September 6, 2025
Illegal use of syntax value at phase 1 General	5	250	June 8, 2023
Use symbol _ or not if _ (underscore) is reserved already General	5	271	July 24, 2023

Source code of rec from SRFI 31

Related topics