Hi, i searched a moment before asking in racket mailing list. There is a definition of rec in the official SRFI 31 SRFI 31: A special form `rec' for recursive evaluation that i recopy here: (define-syntax rec (syntax-rules () ((rec (NAME . VARIABLES) .…

[image] damien_mattei: but i do not understand this part: (lambda VARIABLES . BODY) , this seems to not be valid scheme syntax?! There is an implicit requirement that BODY be list-structured for the resulting lambda form to be valid. More specifically, a lambda must have one or more body expr…

Source code of rec from SRFI 31

Questions & Answers

damien_mattei November 7, 2025, 11:48am 9

yes but i'm not Champollion

Topic		Replies	Views
How ellipsis works in macro? Questions & Answers question , macro	7	1342	February 19, 2022
Illegal use of syntax value at phase 1 General	5	242	June 8, 2023
Macro syntax incompatibility General	2	194	November 2, 2022
Use symbol _ or not if _ (underscore) is reserved already General	5	256	July 24, 2023
Eval in a function General	21	834	May 3, 2023

Source code of rec from SRFI 31

Related topics