# \#build

**URL:** https://racket.discourse.group/tag/build/188.md

[Latest](https://racket.discourse.group/latest.md) · [Categories](https://racket.discourse.group/categories.md) · [Tags](https://racket.discourse.group/tags.md)

---

## [Understanding building and compile times in DrRacket](https://racket.discourse.group/t/understanding-building-and-compile-times-in-drracket/3450)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@AlexG](https://racket.discourse.group/u/AlexG)\
**Replies:** 11\
**Last updated:** [December 29, 2024, 6:37pm UTC](https://racket.discourse.group/t/understanding-building-and-compile-times-in-drracket/3450 "2024-12-29T18:37:23Z")

</div>

I am on my first not completely trivial Racket project, and it was going really fine. Nothing too demanding, maybe twenty files or so, \< 100k source code, though it's meant to get bigger. I also use two libraries outsid…

---

## [Post-Chez 10 Distro & Release Considerations](https://racket.discourse.group/t/post-chez-10-distro-release-considerations/2739)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@LiberalArtist](https://racket.discourse.group/u/LiberalArtist)\
**Replies:** 4\
**Last updated:** [August 11, 2024, 6:07pm UTC](https://racket.discourse.group/t/post-chez-10-distro-release-considerations/2739 "2024-08-11T18:07:59Z")

</div>

A couple weeks ago, Chez Scheme 10.0 was released, incorporating all of the changes from Racket's branch of Chez Scheme. I'm especially excited about this because Guix has been distributing Racket's branch to support arc…

---

## [Building Racket-8.1 on Solaris 11.3 Sparc](https://racket.discourse.group/t/building-racket-8-1-on-solaris-11-3-sparc/2981)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Nemo](https://racket.discourse.group/u/Nemo)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [June 25, 2024, 9:55pm UTC](https://racket.discourse.group/t/building-racket-8-1-on-solaris-11-3-sparc/2981 "2024-06-25T21:55:59Z")

</div>

Greetings. I am trying to build Racket-8.1 (BC) on Solaris 11.3 Sparc. All goes well until the build reaches cify-startup.rkt. It finishes compiling this and then stops with the announcement "out of memory". The mach…

---

## [Getting closer to a "normal" distribution from a minimal build](https://racket.discourse.group/t/getting-closer-to-a-normal-distribution-from-a-minimal-build/2502)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@abhillman](https://racket.discourse.group/u/abhillman)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [November 16, 2023, 2:19pm UTC](https://racket.discourse.group/t/getting-closer-to-a-normal-distribution-from-a-minimal-build/2502 "2023-11-16T14:19:00Z")

</div>

github.com/racket/racket has two principal ways of building: running make from the root of the repository with appropriate additional flags (e.g. make unix-style PREFIX=\<dir\> as documented in build.md) running make fro…

---

## [How do I rebuild the Racket repository with changes to the Rumble layer?](https://racket.discourse.group/t/how-do-i-rebuild-the-racket-repository-with-changes-to-the-rumble-layer/2297)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@MartianMoorGrove](https://racket.discourse.group/u/MartianMoorGrove)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [September 8, 2023, 6:49pm UTC](https://racket.discourse.group/t/how-do-i-rebuild-the-racket-repository-with-changes-to-the-rumble-layer/2297 "2023-09-08T18:49:04Z")

</div>

Running make at the top-level directory isn't enough, and I'm not finding much Rumble-specific guidance in the README files. My change is a potential performance improvement in hash.ss that I'd like to try.