# \#chez

**URL:** https://racket.discourse.group/tag/chez/98.md

[Latest](https://racket.discourse.group/latest.md) · [Categories](https://racket.discourse.group/categories.md) · [Tags](https://racket.discourse.group/tags.md)

---

## [Best way to integrate "schemesh" written in Chez Scheme, into Racket ecosystem?](https://racket.discourse.group/t/best-way-to-integrate-schemesh-written-in-chez-scheme-into-racket-ecosystem/3629)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Cosmos721](https://racket.discourse.group/u/Cosmos721)\
**Replies:** 8\
**Last updated:** [March 22, 2025, 8:43am UTC](https://racket.discourse.group/t/best-way-to-integrate-schemesh-written-in-chez-scheme-into-racket-ecosystem/3629 "2025-03-22T08:43:55Z")

</div>

I would like to extend my program schemesh, currently written in Chez Scheme, and integrate it within Racket ecosystem. A little background to explain the question: schemesh is a Unix shell scriptable in Chez Scheme. …

---

## [Threading and paralelism](https://racket.discourse.group/t/threading-and-paralelism/3563)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@GunpowderGuy](https://racket.discourse.group/u/GunpowderGuy)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [February 12, 2025, 6:20pm UTC](https://racket.discourse.group/t/threading-and-paralelism/3563 "2025-02-12T18:20:34Z")

</div>

Hello, I'm new to Racket, but I also use Idris2, which compiles to this language. Is there a more detailed explanation of Racket's parallelism beyond these resources? Racket Guide: Parallelism Racket Foreign Library: …

---

## [Post-Chez 10 Distro & Release Considerations](https://racket.discourse.group/t/post-chez-10-distro-release-considerations/2739)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@LiberalArtist](https://racket.discourse.group/u/LiberalArtist)\
**Replies:** 4\
**Last updated:** [August 11, 2024, 6:07pm UTC](https://racket.discourse.group/t/post-chez-10-distro-release-considerations/2739 "2024-08-11T18:07:59Z")

</div>

A couple weeks ago, Chez Scheme 10.0 was released, incorporating all of the changes from Racket's branch of Chez Scheme. I'm especially excited about this because Guix has been distributing Racket's branch to support arc…

---

## [Getting closer to a "normal" distribution from a minimal build](https://racket.discourse.group/t/getting-closer-to-a-normal-distribution-from-a-minimal-build/2502)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@abhillman](https://racket.discourse.group/u/abhillman)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [November 16, 2023, 2:19pm UTC](https://racket.discourse.group/t/getting-closer-to-a-normal-distribution-from-a-minimal-build/2502 "2023-11-16T14:19:00Z")

</div>

github.com/racket/racket has two principal ways of building: running make from the root of the repository with appropriate additional flags (e.g. make unix-style PREFIX=\<dir\> as documented in build.md) running make fro…

---

## [Calling into a Chez Scheme library from Racket -- imported symbol rewritten in vm-eval?](https://racket.discourse.group/t/calling-into-a-chez-scheme-library-from-racket-imported-symbol-rewritten-in-vm-eval/2257)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@awwx](https://racket.discourse.group/u/awwx)\
**Replies:** 9\
**Last updated:** [September 1, 2023, 2:15am UTC](https://racket.discourse.group/t/calling-into-a-chez-scheme-library-from-racket-imported-symbol-rewritten-in-vm-eval/2257 "2023-09-01T02:15:31Z")

</div>

I have a Chez Scheme library "foo.ss" that I'd like to call from Racket: (library (foo) (export bar) (import (rnrs)) (define (bar) "hello")) From Chez Scheme: $ chezscheme Chez Scheme Version 9.5.4 Copyright…

---

## [Code compression options](https://racket.discourse.group/t/code-compression-options/908)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@LiberalArtist](https://racket.discourse.group/u/LiberalArtist)\
**Replies:** 5\
**Last updated:** [May 27, 2023, 1:38pm UTC](https://racket.discourse.group/t/code-compression-options/908 "2023-05-27T13:38:38Z")

</div>

A while ago, someone asked me this question about Chez code compression options when building Racket: Would it be an option to instead turn off compression and keep doing things as usual? In theory, this should be…

---

## [Chez for architectures without native backends](https://racket.discourse.group/t/chez-for-architectures-without-native-backends/950)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@LiberalArtist](https://racket.discourse.group/u/LiberalArtist)\
**Replies:** 29\
**Last updated:** [August 21, 2022, 9:04pm UTC](https://racket.discourse.group/t/chez-for-architectures-without-native-backends/950 "2022-08-21T21:04:48Z")

</div>

In light of this enhancement in Racket 8.5: I'm trying to understand how to adapt Guix's package of Racket's Chez Scheme variant to support e.g. powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu, which is one of Guix's supported systems. …
