# \#zuo

**URL:** https://racket.discourse.group/tag/zuo/123.md

[Latest](https://racket.discourse.group/latest.md) · [Categories](https://racket.discourse.group/categories.md) · [Tags](https://racket.discourse.group/tags.md)

---

## [Post-Chez 10 Distro & Release Considerations](https://racket.discourse.group/t/post-chez-10-distro-release-considerations/2739)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@LiberalArtist](https://racket.discourse.group/u/LiberalArtist)\
**Replies:** 4\
**Last updated:** [August 11, 2024, 6:07pm UTC](https://racket.discourse.group/t/post-chez-10-distro-release-considerations/2739 "2024-08-11T18:07:59Z")

</div>

A couple weeks ago, Chez Scheme 10.0 was released, incorporating all of the changes from Racket's branch of Chez Scheme. I'm especially excited about this because Guix has been distributing Racket's branch to support arc…

---

## [Writing the Zuo version number](https://racket.discourse.group/t/writing-the-zuo-version-number/1105)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@LiberalArtist](https://racket.discourse.group/u/LiberalArtist)\
**Replies:** 1\
**Last updated:** [June 30, 2022, 12:13am UTC](https://racket.discourse.group/t/writing-the-zuo-version-number/1105 "2022-06-30T00:13:03Z")

</div>

How should Zuo's version number be written? I know that, in Zuo, (hash-ref (runtime-env) 'version) produces 1, but 1 is not a valid-version? in the sense of version/utils. I also know that Racket and Chez Scheme pack th…