Hi All,
I have put together a new string library.
Comments are welcome.
Hi All,
I have put together a new string library.
Comments are welcome.
Things you may consider:
s plurals this clearly leaves woman->women outside. But you can give an example whether it covers wife->wives.All these can be called nits.
Kind regards:
al_shopov
На нд, 22.02.2026 г. в 18:50 Jens Axel Søgaard <notifications@racket.discoursemail.com> написа:
Hi Al,
Thanks for the feedback!
- You may explicitly state that ASCII is 7 bit code point one, not extended ASCII. Perhaps in Scheme land ASCII predominantly means 7 bit one.
I looked it up. As I understand it "ASCII" is used for 7 bit and "extended ASCII" is used for 8 bit.
- string-{plural,singular}ize - these are not general string functions. They are at least partially language aware and may be in a different package. Since you only cover
splurals this clearly leaves woman->women outside. But you can give an example whether it covers wife->wives.
These are indeed simplistic and restricted to English.
Are they too simple to be useful?
- The -left/right suffixes strongly indicate left to right writing systems. -start/end are more neutral
Here I am attempting to use what's known from racket/string and srfi 13 which both use left/right.
- You mention SRFI-13 but if I am reading SRFI 13: String Libraries correctly:
string-trim-left should be just string-trim
I am following the lead of racket/string here. It has a string-trim (so I can't use the same name) that defaults to trimming from both sides. The keywords for one side trimming is #:left and #:right. So the three names I choose are: string-trim-both, string-trim-left and string-trim-right.
So what do people think, should I remove string-{plural,singular}ize ?